OER’s, DL’s, Reuse and Culture
its about being a phd student researching digital resoures in a multicultural world.Archive for October, 2007
inspiration and aect.
i just got back from aect. it was in anaheim this year, and i was only there for 3 days. as i was getting ready to go to the conference i found myself feeling a distinct lack of inspiration as a phd student. i was feeling unfocused, and – more particularly – i was feeling the weight of all that i have to do to finish this degree here in utah. i was feeling decidedly uninspired by it all and seriously contemplating quitting and heading back home to oregon to find something to do. so, needless to say, this conference was coming at a perfect time.
i’m not going to go through day by day my experiences, but i did hear a lot of really good things, really interesting things. i got to talk a bit about the work i’m doing and hear of another resource i do need to investigate for my reciprocal mentoring project.
the last presentation i went to at the conference was one about technology integration with k-12 teachers. i went to the presentation for 2 reasons – work, and the presenter is a good friend of my chair so i wanted to see what her work was about. i went into the presentation excited to see her, interested in what she was doing, but also knowing that i had my laptop with me and that i could check email if i got bored. well, boredom never occurred because she busted the walls of the usual presentation – no talking head. she had us in groups working. in 1 hour she presented her stuff, had us brainstorm about technology and constructivism, had the groups evaluate other groups ideas, and then put together a lesson plan that incorporated her ideas. it was stunning, and i felt energized afterwards.
later i got to talk to a couple of her former students about her presentation. they told me that this is how she is in class all the time. and it lead me to realize why my favourite professor (mfp) of all times is mfp. it isn’t because of the content they teach, it is because they are inspiring. mfp is excited about the work he is doing and teaching, and that excitement gets translated into his teaching. he gets the students excited simply because he is so excited about it. and that is what this presenter did – got us excited. she was inspiring. she motivated. she gave me just what i am so desperately seeking from my two professors this semester – inspiration.
so, of course it leads me to reflect on what an inspiring teacher is – how is it that they are so inspiring? is one professor inspiring for one set of students and not another? how do we determine that, and is it an important trait to look for as departments seek out new professors to hire? just as people explore creativity in instructional design, should there be discussions about inspiration of teaching future instructional designers and future academics? and lastly – the self reflection – if i hope for it from professors, when i am in their place, can i be it for students who are in my place right now, and how?
or is inspiration just an added bonus to the work? should students be forced to sit and listen to decidedly uninspiring teachers day after day and just tough it out? is uninspired teaching just par for the course, and at the phd level, one more thing we have to toughen out as a part of getting the degree? or should we expect more from our teachers, our professors? should we expect them to inspire, to be excited and to figure out how to translate that excitement into the classroom?
i don’t know the answers to any of the questions i pose, though i do have opinions. my opinion is that teachers / professors should try to inspire, that they should be excited about what they are teaching, that working with students in any teaching and learning environment should be something they look forward too – not something they have to do. if working with students, if teaching, is not of interest to someone they should simply find a research center to work for. that is my opinion. but, on the other side of it, people are different – what might inspire one person isn’t going to inspire another person. me – i’m drawn to and inspired by someone who is charismatic, yet caring. others may be inspired by the quiet person. and, inspiration doesn’t occur everyday, yes, we are all terribly human, and i can understand someone having a bad day, or even a bad semester.
so, yeah. this inspiration thing was the biggest thing that came from my aect experience. not just from professors, but also seeking out inspiration in my own work, on my own. and i am. i’m excited for next semester and the possibilities that await.
mess and more.
this is a quick post, because it’s late. consider this more of a place holder.
i had a good time at the open education conference this past week. i made some nice connections with people, expand my own ideas, and had some ideas confirmed. it was nice to know that i’m not the only one thinking about the things i’m thinking about.
during one presentation the idea of being messy came up. social networks are messy – and thusly the social networks we hope to grow around educational content are going to be messy as well. my thought about that idea is – that when it comes to learning we really aren’t given permission to be messy. in educational settings, to be messy is to fail. to be messy is to get the grade we don’t want to get. it is the rare classroom that the messy are the top students, those that are the top students are the neat ones.
this neatness is encouraged, at least from what i’ve seen, in our formal institutions of learning. from pre-k through the phd, cleanliness is encouraged, and expected. i was talking to a friend after the presentation and i told her that the one place i felt i could be messy was in my relationship with the chair of my phd committee, but as i’m writing this, while i can be messy in that relationship, i try not to be. i try to follow the system. i try to make sure that everything i give to my chair to review is as neat as possible, is clean and doesn’t need much fixing.
so what are we to do? how are we to encourage mess in learning? how do we let people that yes, it is okay to be messy? well. then there’s the whole discussion of changing our own thought patterns about learning, which will eventually begin to change our institutions of learning. i know that there are people who are already doing this, and it needs to become more wide spread. i need to accept that i can be messy in my learning.
as i’m writing this i’m watching a documentary on the whirling dervishes. very very cool. she says at one point that at the beginning of silence is chaos. i think there may be something we can learn from this chaos, from this chaotic meditation, the trance of the dervishes. the mess that this meditation looks like. through this chaos they are able to reach a place of complete peace. this chaos leads them to a place of great knowledge and understanding. pretty cool, eh?
i’ll leave you with this final, not at all related thought, just because it is so beautiful:
i discovered that the roots of hate and destruction emanate from the human mind, not from god. with the power of faith, no force or tyrant can stop anyone from following their hearts. ~ the narrator of the documentary ‘the mystic iran’
hmm. maybe this wasn’t just a place holder, eh?
I'm Brooke, a second year PhD student at Utah State University in Instructional Technology. My interests include digital resources, reuse and localization. Specifically I'm interested in the interplay between culture and reuse of oer's (open educational resources). How can we reuse instructional materials so that they are culturally relevant to users. What is culture? How do we define it in an educational setting? Is making something more culturally relevant more motivating and will that make it more instructionally effective? How can we quantify culture so that we can create processes to more easily adapt instructional resources for the complexities and depth of culture? It's a lifetime of work.