OER’s, DL’s, Reuse and Culture

its about being a phd student researching digital resoures in a multicultural world.

Archive for its about me

the victim of the filter

i’m sitting here in the charlotte international airport witing for a flight to roanoke va – my dad is retiring after 34 years in service to the academy (whoo hoo!  yeah dad!) – and i logged on to their free wireless (gotta love it, free wireless) and upon being redirected to my personal site, found that their filter had decided that my own website wasn’t worth myself having access to it, because its ’sex education’.. yep, the neurotic musings of a first year phd student (of course, i’ve been blogging since ‘00, so it could be the neurotic musings of an activist, etc..) is now considered sex ed.

a couple of years ago i would have gotten all up in arms about it, and i kind of actually am a little miffed about it, but since i’m so exhausted after a day of travelling (and another 2- 3 hours left to go), i’m more amused.

but it is a sign of the times, eh?  or, a sign of the times in charlotte, nc.  i don’t come back to these parts very often – while the appalachains are the most beautiful mountains in the world, and the new river will always have large piece of my heart, it’s just not home.  but i am left to wonder if the blocking of my site is a sign of the political atmosphere around these parts or not.  or, does it really matter?

well, yes, because we must consider the kind of content we put up and we want potential students to seek out and use.  are filters like this going to filter out aids education content?  sex education, important courses for first, second and third world doctors wanting to educate patients and the public about sexually transmitted diseases?

i know, i’m not the first one to ask these kinds of questions, but that this is the first time i’ve been blocked form my own site causes me to write about it.

what will i do about this particular instance?  well, i’ve taken a screen capture, and at some point i’ll email the manufacturer and the charlotte international airport to let them know.  that this is an international airport causes concern, because they have made the effort to make things accessible through this handy dandy free wireless makes me think that they would want people to have access to not just those  things a commercial company deems appropriate.  or, at least i would hope that CLT would want that kind of access available.

on racism

I posted the following response on another blog. It was in response to the question directed at me: “What is your definition of racist?” I think it is more than an appropriate topic to post here. As people who are involved in education I believe that we need to constantly look at ourselves and our own biases, so that our teaching and content can be accessible as possible. Plus, I believe that to be honorable members of society we need to understand our own biases. Many of us don’t intentionally oppress others with our language and actions, but because of the world that we’ve grown up with we often do and we don’t even know that we are doing it. In fact, I would bet that most people would be disappointed with themselves to know that they have been oppressive.

Here’s my response to the question:

I am racist because I notice that someone is black. I am racist because I notice that someone is brown.
I am racist because I notice that I am white.

Race is a part of how we view society. Because I am a highly educated white woman I have advantages that that a highly educated black woman has. Our default in this society is white.

I don’t think its a matter of looking at who has oppressed who in the past, for me it is a matter of acknowledging that racism still exists, and as white person I still get benefits because of the colour of my skin.

To illustrate, from a wonderful book written by a man by the name of Paul Kivel, it is called ‘Uprooting Racism: How White People Can Work for Racial Justice’, some statements from his White Benefits checklist (and comments about my own experience):

  • I live in a school district or metropolitan area where more money is spent on schools that white children attend than on those that children of colour attend. (Yes, this is the case in Eugene, Oregon. I don’t know enough about Logan, UT yet to make a similar statement)
  • I work in a job, career, or profession or in an agency or organization in which there are few people of colour. (Yes. In my lab there is one person of colour (out of 26 of us), and out of 8 faculty members, there are 2 people of colour)
  • I can always vote for candidates who represent my race. (YES! YES! YES!)
  • I see people who look like me in a variety of roles on television and in movies. (Yep)

and on and on and on..

The work that I believe we must do is first and foremost on our own hearts. We have got to recognize our own racial biases. We have got to recognize how we benefit, or not, from being the race we are.

Then we have to change things. We have to become aware of our behavior and the behavior of organizations we participate in. When we hear racist comments we have to stand up to them. We have to be willing to be allies. Then we have to be willing to learn how to recognize, and then give up, our own privilege we carry because of our race. And if our race is not a benefit, I believe we still need to stand up to racist comments and do whatever we can to be allies for ourselves.

more on effectiveness of ocw.

as i’ve stated before, the good professor fellow says that you can’t study the effectiveness of open courseware. i’ve been thinking about it, and as i stated before i’ve been chatting about his comments with some of my fellow phd students, new and old.

we disagree with the good professor fellow. and he may be this brillant guy who coined the term ‘open content’ but as we all know, sometimes its good to put new brains on things.

so, i just got back from a bike ride. my first bike ride in 2 weeks – i had issues with old tires, flat tubes, and bad tubes. it wasn’t a long one, but it was good to clear my brain – a bit – and think about a lot of things – work related, life related, mother nature related (ever been to logan, utah? oh my goodness, how can you not think about mother nature related things on beautiful sunny days in logan, utah? you should come.. to the open ed conference next week, and you can see what i’m talking about).

the work related stuff had to do with the effectivness of open content, and this seemingly inability to study it. and after having a nice chat with my bike and mother nature, i came to the conclusion that maybe the good professor fellow is wrong, and that maybe we mere phd students are right.

how so?

what are the end goals of open courseware? i mean, whats the purpose of investing all this money into all this stuff? why is mit on board with it, notre dame, usu, tufts, johns hopkins? why are we doing this stuff?

and then beyond looking those who are delivering it, lets take it to a higher, more ideological, level. what is the purpose of education? why do we think that education should be a basic human right for everyone? what is the big deal? why do we even care about educating the masses? and please don’t tell me its only about people making money. i’m over that whole capitalistic thing, seriously. lets get a bit more ideological and more heartfelt with our arguments.

i think that we as humans want to learn. we need to learn. we have this drive deep in our souls to fill our brains, hearts, minds, souls, with more knowledge. knowledge has helped us become who we are, knowledge helps us become who we want to be. we are ingrained with a need to learn.

and then there’s the discussion about what is knowledge and what do we want to learn? well, i don’t think that knowledge is just what we get when we go to formalized educational institutions, or even when we sit in front of our computer screens and read news, or when we take classes from institutions beyond official ‘institutions of learning.’ no, i have this more wholistic point of view about learning, and knowledge. i think if we want, we can be learning in nearly every situation we’re in.

i’m still struck by this interaction i had the other day. i was at one of the many socials i seem to be going to, and i got, for a few minutes, to hang out with one of the cutest 15 month olds i’ve ever met. i mean, seriously, this is one cute kid. and i held his hands and we walked around and chatted with people. we walked over to his father, and when he realized thats who we were standing in front of he let out this great gasp of joy, his father let out the same gasp, and even i joined in on the moment. it was a pretty cool moment, and i got to be there.

now, how does that tie in? well, i’m on this whole learning kick. i love to learn. i love to learn from brilliant professors, i love to learn from my friends, i love to learn from young people, and most of all i love to find the learning in moments like the one i got to share with that cute kid and his dad. i am a life long learner (btw, what did i learn in that moment? its personal, but i got to have another lesson in something that i’m learning).

and that gets us back to open courseware and the effectiveness of it. whats the purpose of it all? what is the purpose of open courseware? and how can we study it? i think the purpose of education in all its great forms is to create life long learners. i think its to show people how fun it can be, even in the hardest moments. i think education is about giving people a tool so they can make their lives what they want it to be. and i know, thats all ideological and all, but while i love concrete measures of things, i’m also an ideolouge. i love living in my ideals and even more so, figuring out how i can give those ideals strong ground to stand on. i think that open courseware is one of those things — ideals that if we can look at the effectiveness of its goals, can have strong ground to stand on.

yep, its my first post.

i’m a phd student in instructional technology. yes, we keep blogs. oh yeah, thats what we do. and wikis and del.icio.us accounts and and and and and. and i should be more creative and start this over at my own domain (yes, i have one, have had one for a long time), actually, i should be more of a purist. but anyhow.

the question i’m stuck on today, that i’ve already written about one place, and i’m writing it here, cause this is my official phd weblog, i think is this: by taking a course on OCW and changing it – because that will make it more instructionally effective – can i say that i’m actually studying the effectiveness of OCW? does it have to be in its raw form? because the course in its raw form is NOT instructionally sound. instructionally sound online education is not what this is.. you don’t have pages and pages of scrolling.

now, i am taking it and doing with it what i’m supposed to be doing, but the thing is is that everyone knows that this particular piece of content changes lives, so i don’t need to study that. does it change the lives of young mothers? thats another field, not mine. i’m about the delivery system. thats what all those o’s are in my title.